| :And what your thick headed brain can't understand is that you are forcing air thru the intercooler and not just sucking it thru vacuum. WOW. No shit? Thanks Einstein!!!! I always wondered why it was referred to as "Forced Induction"...lol...you're killing me :Check the numbers for flow on the 24x12x3.5 versus 24x12x4.5
:3.50 12.00 24.00 353 19.20 $532.00 350120240 - Intercooler
:4.50 12.00 24.00 453 23.70 $607.00 450120240 - Intercooler
:We are only talking 100CFM more for the intercooler. Or about 50CFM for each turbo. yep. This is why a top down configuration is better. Much larger charge air flow area :The reason I want the greddy 3 row is because it has been proven to 900RWHP. When are you "thick headed brain" types going to realize that a dyno is not really an accurate measure of the effectiveness of an intercooler?!?! The last time I checked, dyno's don't measure pressure drop or efficiency. These are the only parameters that apply to IC design. Ash has run over 400 RWHP on stock IC's...does that mean stock IC's are good? Hell no. :The HKS Type S which is smaller than the UAS and apollo has done 650RWHP many of times. yawn. who cares. who's to say a different FMIC wouldn't do better? Without pressure drop and efficiency measurements it will be very difficult to tell if one FMIC design is any better than another
|
